I first read the iconic American novel, To Kill a Mockingbird as a high school sophomore. I wholeheartedly took to the book, and if memory serves, I immediately reread it and have done so a few more times over the years. Then I saw the great movie with Gregory Peck. That quickly became one of my favorite films. With all this in mind, I approached Harper Lee’s first novel, Go Set a Watchman. As my loyal readers know, I assiduously avoid reviews of books on my TBR pile, but the hype for this novel was everywhere. Try as I did, tidbits reached me before publication, and I began to question whether I possibly wanted to risk spoiling my image of Lee, Scount, Atticus, and Maycomb County, Alabama. In the end, I decided to take the risk and I took the plunge.
The novel left me
with more questions than I could handle.
Did Harper Lee sugarcoat Atticus, clearly a stand in for her father A.C.
Lee? Did the earlier novel exaggerate
Atticus’ true character to something horrific?
How did Nell Lee, as Scout, fit into the narrative? The prose of Watchman is something of a shadow of the great writing in Mockingbird. Did the publisher reject it for that
reason? Or for the portrayal of
Atticus? More importantly, why did
Harper Lee agree to the publication of this novel as she approaches the end of
her life? Was she setting the record straight? Or, as some have accused, was she the victim
of someone who saw a pot of gold under the cover of the novel?
Scout, now 26, lives
and works in New York. She comes south
for an annual visit with her father and Calpurnia and all her high school
friends. In one scene, the friends
gather in the Finch living room, and Scout listens in amazement to the
conversation. She despises her friends,
their lifestyle, their attitude toward African-Americans, and the recently
passed Civil Rights Acts of the 60s.
Yet, curiously, she does not challenge any of her friends. Rather she muses, if she marries Henry, her
father’s law partner and a childhood friend, her life will slide into step with
all her friends.
In a scene
reminiscent of the young Scout in Mockingbird,
she sneaks off to the courthouse and takes a seat in the balcony and watches
her father introduce a speaker at a meeting of the White Citizens Council, of
which her father is president with Henry seated beside him.
The racism of Mockingbird and the terrible tragedy of
Tom Robinson still bring tears to my eyes.
I don’t need piling on Atticus to press home the point. In Watchman,
Scout refers to a criminal case involving a black man that Atticus only
took on, because he knew he could win.
Who is the real A.C. Lee? Who is
the real Atticus Finch? Who is the real
Scout, the real Harper Lee?
I did read one
review from an African-American journalist, who applauded the novels expose of
racism in the 60s. I know we must never,
ever forget the horrors of slavery. But
I feel certain that back then many people did decry the Jim Crow laws. So, isn’t it better to have Atticus a kindly
man? A devoted father? A man seeking justice regardless of the color
of the defendant’s skin?
I am not going to
quote from Harper Lee’s first novel, Go
Set a Watchman. I think anyone who
loves Atticus, Scout, and Jem, who hates racism can decide whether or not to go
down this path.
--Chiron, 9/8/15